Liquorice (British English) or licorice (American English) (/ ˈ l ɪ k ər ɪ ʃ / LIK-ər-is(h), / ˈ l ɪ k ər ə s /) is the common name of Glycyrrhiza glabra, a flowering plant of the bean family Fabaceae, from the root of which a sweet, aromatic flavouring can be extracted. Darrell Lea Black Soft Australian Made Licorice (8) 7oz Bags - NON-GMO, NO HFCS, Vegetarian & Kosher - America's #1 Soft Eating Licorice Brand! 4.6 out of 5 stars 1,859 $23.75.
SlideIT Black Licorice Skin is an Android Personalization app that is developed by Dasur Ltd. and published on Google play store on NA. It has already got around 100000 so far with an average rating of 4.0 out of 5 in play store.
SlideIT Black Licorice Skin requires Android OS version of 3.4 and up. Also, it has a content rating of Everyone from which one can decide if it is suitable to install for family, kids or adult users.
Since SlideIT Black Licorice Skin is an Android app and cannot be installed on Windows PC or MAC directly, we will show how to install and play SlideIT Black Licorice Skin on PC below:
If you follow the above steps correctly, you should have the SlideIT Black Licorice Skin app ready to run on your Windows PC or MAC.
Liquorice (confectionery) has been listed as a level-5 vital article in an unknown topic. If you can improve it, please do. This article has been rated as start-Class. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Liquorice (confectionery) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources:Google (books·news·newspapers·scholar·free images·WP refs) ·FENS·JSTOR·NYT·TWL |
WikiProject Food and drink | (Rated Start-class, Low-importance) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RandelitoRand. Peer reviewers: Coldresonance. |
Heh heh heh. As well as red, they do green, orange, yellow; all flavoured differently...but beware of the uber-tasty dark blue liquorice, flavoured raspberry. I once ate two seven-inch lengths and my poo turned green for three days. Needless to say, I never bought it again... Lady BlahDeBlah 22:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Now I'm envisioning a disgusting experiment which consists of a diet of blue liquorice and asparagus and extensive use of public toilets. 125.237.75.108 11:14, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Removed this from the page:'though the finest production (and harvesting) occurs in the Macedonian region'.for the love of god provide a citation at the very least. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.186.1.195 (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
So the 'red licorice', which is so famous in the USA, does not actually contain any liquorice? That makes as much sense as calling water beer... oh, but from what I've heard (I don't have experience of it myself), most people in the USA already do. =) JIP Talk 11:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
This article was mentioned in episode 3 of season 5 of Pen and Teller's Bullshit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.109.27.67 (talk) 10:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm, I previously edited out the sentence The black color is strengthened by the use of carbon black as a food colouring agent. since I suspected vandalism; that change has been reverted. As far as I know (and as far as wikipedia knows), carbon black is partially burned hydrocarbon. Such material might not really be healthy to ingest, at least not unless there were special conditions during production of the carbon black to make sure no harmful compounds were created. This is certainly possible, but I would be less sceptical if there were some way to confirm this, or to confirm that regular carbon black is considered safe for consumption; given that carbon black is suspected of containing carcinogens, the latter could seem unlikely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakkura (talk • contribs) 02:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
There is no carbon black in liquorice... otherwise it would show up in the ingredient list... and carbon black is used for colouring plastics and making plastics stronger... it's not used in foods.
The black colour comes at least partically from molasses... which is used in the production of most forms of soft liquorice. Molasses should be added to the list of liquorice ingredients... as should wheat... as all the common types of liquorice use them. Wheat is just a binder... the molasses is responsible for some of the tangy taste.
The GI of liquorice should also be queried. When you mix a lot of different things together you tend to lower GI not raise it. A search of the literature could not come up with a GI for liquorice.
A general search found that liquorice is used in some herbal diabetic medications. The general contra-indication (using liquorice if you have diabetes) could not be tracked down to any particular source except for the tendency to raise blood pressure (which has little to do with sugar levels). As most of the liquorice formulations will also be high in trace minerals (molasses is very high in minerals) and we know that trace minerals such as chromium and vanadium (among others) improve sugar metabolism liquorice might not be so bad. Certainly diabetic shops often sell liquorice confectionary with a low GI: http://www.danisco.com/cms/connect/corporate/products%20and%20services/food/confectionery/gummies%20jellies%20liquorice%20chews/gummies_jellies_liquorice_chews_en.htm A GI for a more common type of liquorice (not liquorice allsorts) should put the issue to rest.
Nb. Calculating GI's is a very imprecise science... which might explain why GI's for many foods are so hard to find. This is further complicated by the fact that the GI will vary between formulations of liquorice (the formulations vary widely).
A search on the literature did come up with http://www.confectionerynews.com/news/ng.asp?id=65329-compounds-in-liquorice a reference showing that some compounds in liquorice fight tooth decay.... contrary to the wiki information.
I would have put at least some of this in the Wiki... but the first part of the article... which drew my attention doesn't seem to have an edit option. How is it edited? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slick12 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
In the US, or at least the parts I've been in, red licorice is generally a great deal more popular than black, to the point where, contrary to the article, most people call red licorice 'licorice' and black licorice 'black licorice'.--209.243.31.233 00:24, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Them Americans and their weak stomachs. Are they so used to overly sweet sugar candies that they can't handle even proper liquorice? My brother tried giving his friends some salty liquorice when he was in the French Riviera. Almost everyone hated it. However, liquorice candies made of real liquorice are very popular throughout France. I wonder what would happen if I were to go to the USA and give people salty liquorice? JIP Talk 17:26, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Can't speak for the rest of the world, but in Australia red liquorice does contain liquorice extract. It's a lot lower in concentration than the strawberry flavouring, but it is there. (At least in the Ricci and Darrel Lea branded stuff) Phild 99 (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
I propose moving this page to 'Liquorice confectionary'. 'Candy' is too US centric Albatross2147 (talk) 03:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
I've changed this section from 'Specific varieties of liquorice candy' to 'Notable varieties of liquorice candy'. This will hopefully prevent people from adding every known brand of licorice on the market to the list (making it meaningless and unmanageable).
Is it reasonable to restrict the list to only those varieties that already have articles? Certainly there are notable varieties that don't yet have articles, and non-notable varieties that do have articles, but other than a paragraph on each variety explaining its notability, the existence of a stable article seems like the only way to determine notability. Any objections to using this as a criteria for inclusion? -kotra (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
This is mainly addressed to JoelDick, but hopefully other users will offer their opinions and, if available, better sources.
The source given by JoelDick after the claim that 'Some people report that black licorice candy causes their stools to become green' is a page on the Mayo Clinic website wherein a doctor answers a question about green stools. In no way does it seem to support the assertion that there have been reports that liquorice causes green stools. Moreover, JoelDick states that 'the author mistakenly attributes black stools to licorice' – well, that's the only mention of liquorice/licorice on that page, and if the editor adding the link himself believes that it's mistaken, then why link to it?
None of the other sources makes any mention of liquorice (except a couple of comments by users in one of them) and most aren't reliable sources. Also, it's original research to say that this is 'probably due to the blue food colouring' (see specifically WP:SYN: 'Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources' – emphasis mine). However, that's moot if you can't even provide a satisfactory source to show a link between liquorice and green stools.
It may well be true that liquorice consumption has been found to cause green stools for some, but better sources are needed. –CapitalLetterBeginning (talk) 11:27, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Why does 'Green Apple' appear in the list of 'Notable varieties of liquorice'? The link takes you to the Granny Smith page. I'm guessing 'Green Apple' is a brand name candy...? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.153.68 (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Oughtn't this be titled Liquorice (confection)? Confectionery is defined in every dictionary I can see (both American and British) as sweets or candies collectively, or a place where such candies are sold; an individual type of candy is simply a confection. The title should be changed, as should the article, e.g. 'Liquorice is a confectionery flavoured' to 'Liquorice is a confection flavoured', etc. --76.28.236.209 (talk) 17:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
I was told that licorice containing the real plant extract was outlawed in America a long time ago. Supposedly, black licorice sold there was completely artificially flavored and colored to taste and look like the real thing. The rationale was brain damage in very young children. Is that true and are there any sources to back it up? 213.29.115.6 (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Liquorice (confectionery). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these 'External links modified' talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}}
(last update: 15 July 2018).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 17:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
One editor is repeatedly reverting without explanation legimate edits: [2] and [3]. They have also been posting faking warnings about the same [4]. This editor should be aware that per cent is two words, see [5]. They should also familiarise themselves with Wikipedia’s guidelines regarding ‘assuming good faith’ and hence posting threats without engaging in discourse is inappropriate. They should also familiarise themselves with the guidelines about leaving edit summaries. Thankfully another, and more contstructive, editor subsequently interevened with a related edit that is valid, see [6]. Hopefully the unconstructive editor will now leave the article alone, and also consider more constructive actions in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.106.14.81 (talk) 13:57, 31 March 2019 (UTC)